This NYT
article
in the paper
yesterday got me thinking again about the ethics of reality
shows, and how much we are encouraging the abuse and degradation
of human beings by watching them.
Image: My
daughter's current fave reality show.
The article
was mainly about competition shows-- the kind where contestants
are eliminated week by week. Survivor
was the
first of this kind, but there are dozens now, something to suit
everyone's interests. There's one about losing weight, there's
one about dancing, and there's even one about losing weight while
dancing.
The point of
the article is that contestants in these shows are pushed to
physical and mental limits in order to improve the watchability
of the shows-- everyone loves suffering, especially if it's
real-- and yet very, very few of the "stars" of these lucrative
shows, the contestants, make any money off of them while they're
in them.
I was all
ready to whip off a post about how reality performers should be
unionized when I decided to take a step back and ask an expert
about the situation.
My daughter
loves competition shows. She's currently wild about
Designstar,
which has just started its new season, but she goes crazy
for American
Idol,
So You
Think You Can Dance,
Project
Runway,
America's
Next Top Model, and
The
Fashion Show. As a tween she cycled
between the Disney Channel and Nickelodeon, but nowadays, in her
early teenage herodom, she wants to study human social behavior,
especially at its extremes.
I watch most of these shows with her, and we comment on what's
going on. I figured she had a healthy understanding of the
complicity we have with the producers when we feast on
contestants' suffering.
But when I
asked her if she thought it was unfair that competition show
contestants are not paid, her response was, "Life isn't fair.
That's what you told me, isn't it?"
Touché. A
palpable hit.
Daughter's
bedrock contention was that no one was forcing these people to be
in reality shows. She said over and over that they must know what
they're getting into when they sign up for them.
Besides, she
continued, by going on television, the contestants were getting
exposure and showcasing their talents for making money in other
venues.
And "If they
were paid," she argued, "they wouldn't try as hard to win the
competition."
Folks, this
gal is a vegetarian with a soft spot for dogs, cats, and pigs.
But that soft spot doesn't extend to people, I guess. She is my
own Artemis, protector of the wild and slayer of the
unworthy.
Worse, I
really had no counterargument to offer. As long as people keep
signing up to do reality shows for the sole privilege of being
humiliated on national television, there's nothing any of us can
do. As daughter pointed out, "It's not going to change
anything if I stop watching those shows. They're still going to
put them on."
I have to
give kudos to my girl for her principled stance on meat-eating,
and for her iron-clad arguments about reality shows. Maybe she's
got her compassion right where it needs to be. Why
care about reality show contestants when they're the ones who
signed up for their own execution?
Well. At
least on Designstar, there's some humanity. This
week,
when one of the contestants was unable to finish her project and
quietly took some time in the ladies' room to lose it (the
cameras didn't go in there with her, but microphones did), a
couple of the others helped her to make her space look a little
more decent. And guess what? Someone else got axed that
week.
That's
entertainment.
Comments